INFORMATION SYSTEM TO SUPPORT ASSESSMENT OF MASTER'S THESIS: AN EXAMPLE OF IMPLEMENTATION IN THE DIGITAL EDUCATIONAL ENVIRONMENT OF A HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTION

Authors

  • Mokriev Maksym
  • Kuzminska Olena

Keywords:

information system, master's thesis, assessment, plagiarism check software, LMS Moodle

Abstract

The digitization of education increasingly impacts fundamental business processes within modern higher education institutions. This study exemplifies the digitalization of specific processes involved in the preparation and presentation of master's thesis results. We have developed an information system designed to support the evaluation of master's theses through expert assessment and automated plagiarism detection, adhering to institutional regulations and general guidelines on academic integrity. Key business processes include user management, master's thesis evaluation management, and dissemination of research outcomes. These processes were decomposed following standards of structural and functional analysis and design, incorporating role assignment for potential system users. We propose implementing this system using the LMS Moodle platform, which facilitates resources for thesis text submission, document downloads, peer reviews, student counseling, and communication among educational stakeholders based on defined roles. Integration of the Unicheck plagiarism detection module within LMS Moodle enables efficient text similarity checks. Leveraging Learning Tools Interoperability (LTI) technology supported by LMS Moodle, electronic educational resources from the university's educational and informational portal can be seamlessly integrated with the master's theses repository. The study emphasizes that establishing an information and educational environment within a higher education institution and consolidating a unified user base will streamline the implementation of the proposed information system both organizationally and technologically, minimizing costs.

References

1. Bershadskaya, M., Voznesenskaya, Y., & Karpenko, O. (2016). Research webometrics: Ranking in the context of accessibility of higher education. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 4(7), 1506–1514. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2016.040702.

2. Webometrics.info. (2024). 21st anniversary edition (2004-2024). https://www.webometrics.info/en/current_edition (available 1.07.2024).

3. Smyrnova-Trybulska, E., Morze, N., & Kuzminska, O. (2018). Academic information transparency: From teachers' e-portfolio to upgrading the rankings of universities. In Distance Learning in Applied Informatics (DIVAI) (pp. 347–358). Nitra, Slovakia.

4. Kuz'minskaya, E. G. (2014). Informatsionnye tekhnologii i nauchnaya kommunikatsiya: instrumenty i modeli vnedreniya v usloviyakh universiteta [Information technologies and scientific communication: tools and models of implementation at the university]. Educational Technologies and Society, 17(1), 447–456.

5. European Commission, Directorate-General for Research and Innovation, Keesenberg, R., Tsoukala, V., Barbarossa, E., & Bjornsson, A. (Eds.). (2020). Access to and preservation of scientific information in Europe: Report on the implementation of Commission recommendation C(2018)2375 final. Publications Office. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2777/950244.

6. Eaton, S. E. (2021). Plagiarism in higher education: Tackling tough topics in academic integrity. ABC-CLIO.

7. Levine, J., & Pazdernik, V. (2018). Evaluation of a four-prong anti-plagiarism program and the incidence of plagiarism: A five-year retrospective study. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(7), 1094–1105. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1434127

8. Comas-Forgas, R., Lancaster, T., Calvo-Sastre, A., & Sureda-Negre, J. (2021). Exam cheating and academic integrity breaches during the COVID-19 pandemic: An analysis of internet search activity in Spain. Heliyon, 7(10), e08233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08233

9. Striepe, M., Thomson, S., & Sefcik, L. (2023). Understanding academic integrity education: Case studies from two Australian universities. Journal of Academic Ethics, 21, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-021-09429-x.

10. Li, X., Zhao, J., & Yan, W. (2022). Integrity levels of Chinese college students: An analysis of influencing factors. Frontiers in Education, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.843674.

11. Fudge, A., Ulpen, T., Bilic, S., et al. (2022). Does an educative approach work? A reflective case study of how two Australian higher education enabling programs support students and staff uphold a responsible culture of academic integrity. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 18(5). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-021-00099-1

12. Almusawi, H. (2019). Paper review: Protecting students’ intellectual property in the web plagiarism detection process. International Journal of Teaching and Education, 7(1), 1–6.

13. de Bruijn, E., van der Marel, I., & Munneke, L. (2022). Supervising graduation projects in higher professional education: A literature review. Educational Research Review, 37, 100462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2022.100462.

14. de Kleijn, R. A. M., Mainhard, M. T., Meijer, P. C., Brekelmans, M., & Pilot, A. (2013). Master’s thesis projects: Student perceptions of supervisor feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 38(8), 1012–1026. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2013.777690.

15. Jugder, N. (2019). Reviewing the quality of master’s dissertations. University of Leeds. https://doi.org/10.48785/100/239.

16. Aghaee, N., & Keller, C. (2016). ICT-supported peer interaction among learners in Bachelor’s and Master’s thesis courses. Computers & Education, 94, 276–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.11.006

17. Björk, B.-C. (2007). A model of scientific communication as a global distributed information system. Information Research, 12(2), 307. http://InformationR.net/ir/12-2/paper307.html.

18. Hlazunova, O. H., Mokriiev, M. V., Kuzminska, O. H., & Yakobchuk, O. V. (2018). Arkhitektura hibrydnoho khmaro-oriientovanoho seredovyshcha navchalnoho zakladu [Architecture of a hybrid cloud-oriented environment of an educational institution]. Komprynt.

19. Centre for Learning & Performance Technologies. (2023). Top tools for learning 2023: Top tools by category. https://optools4learning.com/top-tools-by-category/ (available 1.07.2024).

Published

2025-01-25

Issue

Section

All articles from the issue