Analysis of machine learning algorithms for biogas yield prediction

Authors

  • V. Lysenko National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine image/svg+xml
  • T. Lendyel National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine image/svg+xml
  • S. Pavlov National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine image/svg+xml

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31548/energiya3(67).2023.100

Abstract

Currently, effective management of biogas production remains a difficult task.

The purpose of the research is to analyze machine learning algorithms for predicting biogas output depending on the characteristics of biogas production.

Currently, there is no necessary set of data, analyzing which indicators can be obtained to optimize biogas production in our installation. At the same time, testing various optimization algorithms and deciding on the best takes a lot of time, as experience shows.

The application of machine algorithms for forecasting biogas production by using existing forecasting methods is considered. Provided that the control systems of typical biogas productions are equipped with the necessary sensing elements, there still remains the task of processing and analyzing data to make the best decision to meet the relevant technological requirements. The reason for this is the large volume of data and the complexity of the interaction of processes that are components of production. In this context, machine learning can be a useful tool for optimizing biogas production.

Key words: machine learning, biogas output, automated control, control algorithms, mathematical model

References

Kaggle.com. JM Biogas production experiment analysis jumpstart. Available at: https://www.kaggle.com/code/ivandaudt/jm-biogas-production-experiment-analysis-jumpstart/notebook.

Amazon SageMaker Autopilot. Available at: [https://aws.amazon.com/sagemaker/autopilot/?nc1=h_ls&sagemaker-data-wrangler-whats-new.sort-by=item.additionalFields.postDateTime&sagemaker-data-wrangler-whats-new.sort-order=desc].

Essam Al Daoud. Comparison between XGBoost, LightGBM and CatBoost Using a Home Credit Dataseю Available at: [https://publications.waset.org/10009954/comparison-between-xgboost-lightgbm-and-catboost-using-a-home-credit-dataset].

Muhammad Waseem Ahmad, Jonathan Reynolds, Yacine Rezgui. Predictive modelling for solar thermal energy systems: A comparison of support vector regression, random forest, extra trees and regression trees. Available at: [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652618325551].

Pierre Geurts, Damien Ernst, Louis Wehenkel. Extremely randomized trees. Available at: [https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10994-006-6226-1].

J. A. Nelder, R. W. M. Wedderburn. Generalized Linear Models. Available at: [https://rss.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.2307/2344614].

Rita Yi Man Li, Herru Ching Yu Li, Beiqi Tang, WaiCheung Au. Fast AI classification for analyzing construction accidents claims. Available at[https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.1145/3407703.3407705].

Sagar Imambi, Kolla Bhanu Prakash, G. R. Kanagachidambaresan. PyTorch. Available at: [https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-57077-4_10].

Weijie Wang, Yanmin Lu . Analysis of the Mean Absolute Error (MAE) and the Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) in Assessing Rounding Model. Available at:[https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1757-899X/324/1/012049/meta].

Kalyan Das, Jiming Jiang, J. N. K. Rao. Mean squared error of empirical predictor. Available at: [https://projecteuclid.org/journals/annals-of-statistics/volume-32/issue-2/Mean-squared-error-of-empirical-predictor/10.1214/009053604000000201.full].

Alon Brutzkus, Ran Gilad-Bachrach, Oren Elisha. Low Latency Privacy Preserving Inference. Available at [http://proceedings.mlr.press/v97/brutzkus19a].

Rich Caruana, Alexandru Niculescu-Mizil, Geoff Crew, Alex Ksikes. Ensemble selection from libraries of models. Available at: [https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.1145/1015330.1015432].

Robert E. Weiss, Carlos G. Lazaro. Residual plots for repeated measures. Available at: [https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.4780110110].

Zhila Esna Ashari, Nairanjana Dasgupta, Kelly A Brayton, Shira L Broschat. An optimal set of features for predicting type IV secretion system effector proteins for a subset of species based on a multi-level feature selection approach. Available at: [http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0197041].

Downloads

Published

2023-09-07

Issue

No. 3 (2023)

Section

Статті

License

Relationship between right holders and users shall be governed by the terms of the license Creative Commons  Attribution – non-commercial – Distribution On Same Conditions 4.0 international (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0):https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/deed.uk

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  • Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).